Construction of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database: Sources and Methods

David Eltis (Emory University), 2010

Nature of Sources

Much of what is new in this data set lies in the sources, which call for some discussion. The published data draw on a wide range of published and archival information. Postma, Mettas, and Richardson used new material in the preparation of their published catalogues of voyages. Our data set does not reproduce all the sources that previous authors used and listed. Thus, voyages drawn from published sources are represented here by that single reference to them alone. Anyone wishing to consult their archival references will have to look them up in the hard copy of these published volumes. We edited individual voyage details in these collections only when we found new documentary evidence to support a change; consequently, we added these new references to the source record. Pulling together the results of work carried out in separate national archives was particularly fruitful because trans-Atlantic slave vessels could clear from one jurisdiction and arrive in the Americas in another. Specifically, the international nature of the slave trade meant that a voyage that might appear primarily in one national body of records had a very good chance of showing up, in addition, in the records of other countries. Thus, voyages organized by London merchants operating independently of the Royal African Company (RAC) in the 1670s and 1680s obtained their slaves in South-east Africa, outside the RAC’s English monopoly and where the English East India Company had little physical presence. Because almost all these ships called at the Cape before beginning their trans-Atlantic journeys, several of them appear in the Dutch Cape of Good Hope archives.(3 ) Portuguese ships leaving Bahia in Brazil for the "Mina" coast appear in English Cape Coast Castle material at the Public Record Office. Slave ships of every nationality appear in Lloyd’s Lists, and of course the hundreds of slave ships captured in the many European wars are often carefully documented in the archives of the captors, as well as in the records of the nations to which the ships belonged. Indeed, the South Atlantic Portuguese trade has fewer sources per voyage, precisely because this branch of the traffic operated independently of the others. Winds and ocean currents kept the South Atlantic trade out of the non-Portuguese archives, as well as keeping northern Europeans out of South Atlantic ports.

Of the 34,948 voyages in the data set, 12,320 have only one source listed. In fact, more than half of these apparently single-source records are taken from already published material where, in nearly all cases, additional primary references are to be found. Furthermore, other publications on which the present data set draws, such as Coughtry’s listing of Rhode Island voyages, are based on a range of primary documents which are not listed by voyage in the publication itself. After allowing for these multi-sourced single references, it would appear that perhaps only one in six of the 34,948 voyages are based on a single historical record. Sixty percent of the voyages in the set have three or more separate sources each. Researchers should no longer need to depend on data collected on the basis of a single source. Abbreviated reference to the sources for any particular voyage can be viewed in the results section of the database by clicking on “configure columns” and transferring “sources” from left box to the right box in the resulting window. The full reference may be viewed by rolling the cursor over the abbreviated source or by clicking on the row of a voyage to view voyage details. Alphabetic listings of references and full descriptions of locations are to be found in Home> Voyages Database> Understanding the database> Sources .

While the sources are relatively rich, diversity brings a new set of problems. We can hardly expect that reports on voyages made several thousand miles—as well as several months—apart, often in different languages and under different bureaucracies, each with a separate set of official procedures to follow, to always generate perfectly consistent information. For example, 216 voyages in the data set apparently arrived in the Americas with more slaves on board than when they left Africa. Others left port more than once on the same voyage, and some ships reportedly changed tonnage and even rig in the course of the voyage. The same ship occasionally appears under more than one name on the same voyage. Those used to working with a single source per voyage and generating data sets without any conflicting information should be warned that the editors have not attempted to correct all these problems. The data set offered here is by no means "clean" in the sense of being entirely internally consistent. We have pursued and eliminated many of the inconsistencies, but to eliminate all would have imposed an order on the historical record that anyone who has visited the archives (or indeed examined published sources such as Mettas or Richardson) knows does not exist. The editors always entered only one value per variable when faced with alternative information. In making such choices, we followed certain rules that researchers can change after going back to the sources. If users elect to do this, however, they, too, will have a set which is both not "clean" and not necessarily reflective of the historical records from which it is drawn.

Coverage of the Slave Trade Cases and Variables
Copyright 2013 Emory University. Software licensed under GNU General Public License 3.0 or later version. Some content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0.